Firstly, there're such things as pounds and at (plural), or # and @, respectively. And that if you want to pound a word phrasing (non-jocularly, of course) one has to mash said phrase the gether. So 'short stories' becomes #shortstory, the Mod Squad becomes #fashion, etc. And all-the-gods-that-are forbid you quote something without an appropriate @originofthought. Of course, that's the first rule of scholarship... cite yon source.
Also underpinning the Twitter universe is one's notoriety. I've found that unless a body has more followers than followees, that body is schmobody, or maybe twobody... not quite grasped the lex as of yet. Currently I'm batting at a low .216 so far. Also! Have you noticed that there are lots of spammers about on the Twitscape? Like, supposed gals who follow to be followed (as twit-cordiality dictates) then pipe on about relationship advice and torrid sex talk, in between pushing scam link-ups. Maybe that's just the me, but it smacked odd at first glance. Second glance and I understood, of course. Large nets cast over the e-seas of loneliness, I suppose.
Obligingly taken from http://kaitlinring.wordpress.com/tag/culture/ More like than not, she'd kyped it from elsewhere... Is that libel? |
But that's the Rudian day of the now; although the GOP debate (or debacle) certainly raised my eyebrows here and there. The Obama 2012 train seems set to roll onwards, potentially under the slogan "Really? This is their candidate??"
No comments:
Post a Comment